top of page
EXIT INTEGRITY
How relationships end.
Most systems are judged by how they grow.
Very few are judged by how they let go.
Exit Integrity defines whether separation remains possible once coordination, volume, and dependency increase.
This constraint exists to prevent coercion by permanence.
The Distortion
In most supply systems, exit is allowed in theory
and punished in practice.
Contracts thicken.
Notice periods stretch.
Assets become stranded.
Data disappears.
Reputation becomes leverage.
Leaving becomes more expensive than staying –
even when staying is irrational.
How Distortion Appears
Exit distortion forms through:
​
-
asymmetric termination rights
-
long or undefined notice periods
-
forfeited deposits or tooling
-
withheld payments at separation
-
informal retaliation or blacklisting
-
non-competes disguised as “protection”
Exit is not blocked outright.
It is burdened.
Structural Consequence
When exit integrity collapses:
​
-
inefficient relationships persist
-
loss-making production continues
-
power concentrates silently
-
adaptation slows
-
failure propagates instead of resolving
The system appears stable –
but only because movement is trapped.
Structural Position
In the Chakchouka system, exit is treated as a design requirement.
No relationship is considered healthy
if it cannot end without damage.
Continuity must be chosen –
not enforced by friction.
Constraint Logic
The Exit Integrity constraint enforces five rules:
​
-
Symmetric termination rights
No party holds unilateral exit power.
-
Defined and bounded notice
Exit timelines are explicit and limited.
-
Asset and data restitution
Tools, molds, and information return cleanly.
-
Guaranteed final settlement
Outstanding balances cannot be withheld as leverage.
-
No retaliatory penalties
Exit does not trigger informal punishment.
What This Prevents
Without exit integrity, systems tend to:
​
-
weaponize sunk costs
-
blur cooperation with captivity
-
extract concessions through delay
-
discourage honest renegotiation
-
convert fear into compliance
Exit becomes a threat instead of a mechanism.
What This Enables
When exit remains intact:
​
-
inefficient links dissolve early
-
resources reallocate correctly
-
power stays distributed
-
trust becomes credible
-
long-term cooperation strengthens
Clean exits reduce total damage –
even when relationships end.
Position
This is not instability.
It is controlled reversibility.
A system that survives only by trapping its participants
is not resilient –
it is brittle.
bottom of page